<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cutting your chances of data loss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?feed=rss2&#038;p=46" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46</link>
	<description>Simplicity is the Essence of Good Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Bungle</title>
		<link>http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46&#038;cpage=1#comment-23824</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Bungle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46#comment-23824</guid>
		<description>The process will exit immediately, and the current file will only be partially copied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The process will exit immediately, and the current file will only be partially copied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Bungle</title>
		<link>http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46&#038;cpage=1#comment-23823</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Bungle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46#comment-23823</guid>
		<description>All files are copied, it is not optimized with any comparison criteria at the moment.  What happens is that it deletes the destination area, and then does a full copy (I took the simple approach).  I will look into adding that in, good suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All files are copied, it is not optimized with any comparison criteria at the moment.  What happens is that it deletes the destination area, and then does a full copy (I took the simple approach).  I will look into adding that in, good suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scheherazade</title>
		<link>http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46&#038;cpage=1#comment-23802</link>
		<dc:creator>scheherazade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46#comment-23802</guid>
		<description>Also, what happens if you task kill the process mid copy? Will it complete the current file before servicing the signal, or will it exit immediately?

-scheherazade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, what happens if you task kill the process mid copy? Will it complete the current file before servicing the signal, or will it exit immediately?</p>
<p>-scheherazade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scheherazade</title>
		<link>http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46&#038;cpage=1#comment-23801</link>
		<dc:creator>scheherazade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46#comment-23801</guid>
		<description>Are all files copied, or is there a date/time/size check done so that unnecessary disk activity is avoided?
What are the copy/ignore criteria for what triggers a file to be synced versus ignored?

-scheherazade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are all files copied, or is there a date/time/size check done so that unnecessary disk activity is avoided?<br />
What are the copy/ignore criteria for what triggers a file to be synced versus ignored?</p>
<p>-scheherazade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Bungle</title>
		<link>http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46&#038;cpage=1#comment-13692</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Bungle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46#comment-13692</guid>
		<description>Yes, as long as you have mapped a network drive to the samba share on your ubuntu server, that can be the destination, no problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, as long as you have mapped a network drive to the samba share on your ubuntu server, that can be the destination, no problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carrie</title>
		<link>http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46&#038;cpage=1#comment-13691</link>
		<dc:creator>carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46#comment-13691</guid>
		<description>Hi,
can the destination folder be shared resource?I have a winbox and ubuntu server,in this case is it possible to syn winbox files to ubuntu server??

Thank you,

carrie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
can the destination folder be shared resource?I have a winbox and ubuntu server,in this case is it possible to syn winbox files to ubuntu server??</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>carrie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Bungle</title>
		<link>http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46&#038;cpage=1#comment-13516</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Bungle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46#comment-13516</guid>
		<description>Yes, that deletion will also happen in folder A next time the files get syncronized, since the program&#039;s purpose is to ensure that there is a exact replica (mirror) of the source set of folders.  When you wish to protect against accidental deletion, it comes down to the length of time you would like to give yourself before your file cannot be recovered.  For example, if you mirror your files every night, you have given yourself 24 hours to recover from an accidental deletion.  If you mirror your files every night, but each night to a different destination, say folders named with days of the week, then you have given yourself 7 days to recover, and so on.  So it really depends on the amount of disk space you can spare.  And of course the ultimate alternative is permanent backup, where you only backup the data once and never overwrite it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that deletion will also happen in folder A next time the files get syncronized, since the program&#8217;s purpose is to ensure that there is a exact replica (mirror) of the source set of folders.  When you wish to protect against accidental deletion, it comes down to the length of time you would like to give yourself before your file cannot be recovered.  For example, if you mirror your files every night, you have given yourself 24 hours to recover from an accidental deletion.  If you mirror your files every night, but each night to a different destination, say folders named with days of the week, then you have given yourself 7 days to recover, and so on.  So it really depends on the amount of disk space you can spare.  And of course the ultimate alternative is permanent backup, where you only backup the data once and never overwrite it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46&#038;cpage=1#comment-13504</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46#comment-13504</guid>
		<description>Question:
Folder A is the original, and I have those files mirrored to Folder B.
In Folder B, I delete one file.  Does that deletion then also happen in Folder A, the next time the files get syncronized?
My concern is that if I accidentally delete an important file in one of these, at the next synchronization the other one will replicate that accidental deletion and I&#039;ve lost both copies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question:<br />
Folder A is the original, and I have those files mirrored to Folder B.<br />
In Folder B, I delete one file.  Does that deletion then also happen in Folder A, the next time the files get syncronized?<br />
My concern is that if I accidentally delete an important file in one of these, at the next synchronization the other one will replicate that accidental deletion and I&#8217;ve lost both copies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backup Folder Contents By Creating A Duplicate Copy Of Folder With Folder Mirror</title>
		<link>http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46&#038;cpage=1#comment-13503</link>
		<dc:creator>Backup Folder Contents By Creating A Duplicate Copy Of Folder With Folder Mirror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46#comment-13503</guid>
		<description>[...] Folder Mirror is a freeware program which lets you synchronize folders or create copies of folders, including sub-folders to create backup of these folder and their contents. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Folder Mirror is a freeware program which lets you synchronize folders or create copies of folders, including sub-folders to create backup of these folder and their contents. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Bungle</title>
		<link>http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46&#038;cpage=1#comment-13487</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Bungle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zornsoftware.talsit.info/?p=46#comment-13487</guid>
		<description>Sorry there are no flags like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry there are no flags like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
